Clearly, selecting the right leader is incredibly important for an organisation, and doing so can sometimes feel like weathering a heavy
storm on open seas without a compass.
So if I can at least offer a compass, that might be the first step in offering some security and clarity in making this all-important
decision.
A significant portion of my work is undertaken at senior executive level. In these forums, I have worked with Board Directors, CEOs, school
principals and senior leadership teams. Some extremely wealthy multi nationals are represented alongside some of the smallest and most under
resourced small business.
Over many years and many, many board room and executive discussions, I’ve seen patterns emerge. In particular, I’ve observed one approach to
these discussions that separates the productive from the unproductive. That difference is the use of open versus closed questions.
A culture of responsibility is one of learned aptitude. When leaders and their employees take responsibility, they prove to others and to
themselves that they are capable; that obstacles can be overcome, and that actions lead to results. Conversely, a culture of entitlement is one of learned helplessness. Entitlement is the belief that you are owed something,
and that when you do not receive what you are supposedly owed, it is a failing of your leaders.
A culture of entitlement is a toxic one, because it teaches its members that complaining is the extent of their available responses to
challenge and adversity.
A great leader must be many great things:
Strong.
Humble.
Intelligent.
Open-minded.
And so on.
But if these were enough, we wouldn’t still be having the constant, ever-evolving conversations crucial to the pursuit of great leadership.
Even as children, we seem to innately understand that there is such a thing as strong leadership, and recognise it when we see
it, even if we don’t yet have the language for it.
The next step, then, is to give our young people that language, and more importantly, it must be a language that they share with the adults
in their lives. We as adults, and especially those who teach leadership, must respect our future leaders. For many of us,
that extends to trusting them quite a bit more than we currently do.
Are you busy?
I would be very surprised to hear that you’re not. We’re all busy. It seems that now more than ever before we are a culture defined by just
how much we need to do. We work incredibly long hours, and are expected to work overtime if we’re to move up the ladder, or move the needle
in any meaningful way.
You need to avoid “lost causes” at all costs. There’s no way around this fact.
A “lost cause” is any relationship or endeavour that will not, under any circumstances, lead to productive
outcomes. A lost cause is different to something that simply doesn’t work out.
You may negotiate for a deal and end up needing to walk away. You may have to let go of an employee who can’t keep up with their work or
leave your own job because it’s no longer fulfilling. These are cases where you try, and things don’t pan out the way you’d like. That’s the
price of doing difficult things.
A lost cause is one where you have no hope of a positive outcome, even by compromise, no matter how hard you try. These instances are
crippling to yours and your organisation’s wellbeing and productivity.
So how do you identify one, and what do you do about it?
As a leader, you must understand the distinct difference between feeling different and feeling like you belong to a diverse group. One
breaks down trust and the other builds it.
So long as the environment you create as a leader is safe, the most important thing you can bring to any team is competence. Ultimately,
within the context of an organisation – a team with a specific, shared goal – being good at the thing you’re supposed to be good at is the
most important part you can play.
As such, a productive leader will preference the right person for the job above all else. That person’s gender, sexual
orientation, race, age or anything else shouldn’t matter when it comes to their position on the team. This, frankly, is easier said than
done.
In a previous blog, I argued that regularly asking yourself, am I part of the problem? is one of the key
responsibilities of a good leader. At the end of the piece, I noted that alongside the benefits of developing a habit of total personal
accountability, recognising that you might be part of the problem at least means that you can also be part of the solution.
In this blog, I’ll explain how.